Category Archives: News

SB 122 – All parents can opt out of SAGE tests

opt out of common core testsGovernor Herbert signed SB122 into law today. All Utah parents can now opt their children out of SAGE tests from any school without repercussion to your child, the teacher, or the school. De-stress your children and tell them to tell their friends they got opted out of the SAGE tests. Trust me, their friends will think it’s amazing and word will spread like wildfire.

The State Board of Education will be discussing the topic of what to do now at their board meeting this Friday. So if your child attends school in Nebo, Harmony, My Tech High, etc…, you can proceed opting them out of the SAGE tests immediately (although, because of the contract some of you signed that your children would take the SAGE test or pay the school back, you may have to take the test or pay the fee this year. Beg the school to change their policy based on the new law, if not immediately, at least for next year.).

Why would you want to opt out? Watch the video at this post to learn why.

Here are the relevant lines from SB 122.

http://le.utah.gov/~2014/bills/static/SB0122.html

“(9) (a) Upon the written request of a student’s parent or guardian, an LEA shall excuse the student from taking a test that is administered statewide or the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

(b) The State Board of Education shall ensure through board rule that neither an LEA nor its employees are negatively impacted through school grading or employee evaluation due to a student not taking a test pursuant to Subsection (9)(a).”

We will come out with a new form but if you just copy/paste this onto a sheet of paper, it will suffice for now.

I am opting my child, ____________, out of all computer adaptive tests including practice tests, under Utah state law, SB 122, signed by Governor Herbert on April 2, 2014 which states:

“(9) (a) Upon the written request of a student’s parent or guardian, an LEA shall excuse the student from taking a test that is administered statewide or the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

(b) The State Board of Education shall ensure through board rule that neither an LEA nor its employees are negatively impacted through school grading or employee evaluation due to a student not taking a test pursuant to Subsection (9)(a).”

Leaked Letter: Panicked Common Core Creators Want Documentary Discredited –or Not Seen

Repost from Christel Swasey’s blog

 

building the machine

A  revealing CCSSO letter, leaked to the public, reveals Common Core investors’ collective panic about Ian Reid’s new film, Building the Machine.

Missouri Education Watchdog and Breitbart News  reported that CCSSO deputy executive director Carissa Miller’s letter shows top Common Core moneymaking / grant-receiving businesses are combining to discredit the Common Core documentary.  Many businesses need Common Core’s claims to be believed, or they lose this gold rush.  So they’re trying to stop it, understandably.

And if the documentary is seen despite their efforts to discredit it, the groups have laid a plan to smother the truth with smooth “positive” talking points and with a soon-to-be-released documentary of their own.

If you watch the film, you’ll know why they’re panicking.   Truth is truth.

The documentary solidly wipes out the “higher standards” claims of Common Core’s creators, using filmed speeches by Common Core’s creators and funders, and using interviews with top Stanford professors, Common Core validation committee members and respected members of think tanks, both for and against Common Core.  Importantly, it shows that the real issue of education reform is not even about academics, ultimately;  it’s about power.

The CCSSO doesn’t want people to know this power struggle exists.  But it does exist.  In fact, who ends up holding decision-making power is the main conflict inside ed reform, despite all the pleasant words about education standards.

As the backers of the new documentary succinctly put it:

“…This issue is  far more than what standards public schools should use. It is about who will decide how and what our children are taught.” -William Estrada, in Breitbart interview.

You can read the leaked letter here.  You can watch the movie here.

I want to point out this part of the panic-letter:

“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Fordham [Institute] have put together the attached two documents that can be used to clarify the vast amount of misinformation that will be circulated as a result of the movie. Please note – these are EMBARGOED until Monday, March 31st…. The U.S. Chamber is in the final stages of producing their own Common Core mini-documentary…  Below we’ve include some tips for messaging and responding to the critical questions this film may generate in your state. We will send out the Chamber video when it is released.

Regards,

Carissa

————————–

Why do they just include “tips for messaging and responding” rather than including documentation, facts, links to contracts and legally valid, scientifically valid evidence?  Evidence is not wanted.  Only marketing, ”messaging.”

carissa-moffat-miller

FYI:    Carissa is  Carissa Miller, CCSSO deputy executive director.

For newcomers:  The CCSSO is a nontransparent group that co-created the Common Core and then partnered with the federal Department of Education to collect data on a national level.  It’s the same group that openly admits it has a “commitment to disaggregation of student data.”

I call the CCSSO a “superintendents’ club”.  It does not include all state superintendents nor is it an elected body.  The CCSSO seems want the public to believe –as does its twin sister, the NGA– that it has voter-designated authority to boss states around.  It does not.  Neither has authority and neither represents voters like our Congress does.  Repeat:  CCSSO and NGA have no elected authority.  Do not be decieved by their pomp.  They are just private groups that combined to create and copyright Common Core, heavily influenced/ funded by philanthopist-turned-takeover-king Bill Gates.

If you care about the traditional American voice of the local voter setting policy, rather than having closed-door private cliques that partner with the feds setting local policy, please oppose  these  goals of the CCSSO.  Make your voice heard.  Let your State Superintendent know you want him/her to bow out of membership in this club to focus energy on local control of education.

–While you’re at it, send your superintendent a link to the movie. 

I hope every American watches it.

 

building the machine

Superintendent Bergeson’s Letter to Parents

I received several copies of an email today that Superintendent Bergeson of the Washington county school district sent to parents of the Dixie middle school. I believe this same superintendent was on air running radio ads during the legislative session announcing that all teachers love Common Core (which is what inspired our teacher ad which we ran in the St. George area). I was asked to reply to this letter and I decided to do it online so that parents can more easily share this post with their neighbors through Facebook and email.

***************

Dear Parents of Dixie Middle School Students,

There are some misunderstandings regarding the Utah State Board of Education’s Core Standards (Utah Core Standards). Although similar, our Utah Core Standards differ from the Common Core State Standards that were initially adopted by 44 states. The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) have served as a political platform for some, including popular media, to create confusion, uncertainty, and in some extreme cases, fear. As such, I felt it necessary to clarify a few of the misconceptions that are being circulated.

Sup. Bergeson is completely right. There are some misunderstandings about Utah’s Core Standards. The misunderstanding is completely his. Superintendent Menlove has already clarified publicly that the Utah Core IS COMMON CORE. Now to be completely clear, the Utah Core covers all subjects while we have only adopted Common Core math and ELA. Common Core has never served as a political platform for anyone except President Obama who has announced the idea was his and we should all be grateful for it.

1. The State of Utah has complete control of Utah’s learning standards in all areas of our public education curriculum. In a letter to former State Superintendent Larry Shumway and Governor Gary Herbert, United States Secretary of Education Arne Duncan reaffirmed that the State of Utah has “…complete control of Utah’s learning standards in all areas of our public education curriculum.” Secretary Duncan went on to further affirm this as he concluded that, “States have the sole right to set learning standards.” (March 7, 2012) Once again, we reaffirm that Utah has not adopted the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) but has retained it’s right to establish the Utah Core Standards.

In a court of law, which trumps which Superintendent? A memorandum of understanding that Utah filed with the feds as part of our official waiver from No Child Left Behind (which a court might term a “contract”) which says Utah agrees to “fully adopt Common Core as written” and “only add up to 15%” to the standards, or a non-contractual letter from Arne Duncan? Hint: contracts have supremacy over non-contractual documents. Further, if the feds fund the assessments and tie student performance to the tests, and 45 states have signed on, how easy can we change the test? Do you honestly think that Utah or any state on Common Core, would change the standards when the TESTS ARE BASED ON THOSE EXACT STANDARDS? The feds control us at this point. They know we’re not going to change the standards because then we’d lose that transferability of students between states that everyone touts as one of the several awesome benefits of Common Core. Once again, I reaffirm that you should read Superintendent Menlove’s comments linked to above that clearly state Utah has adopted Common Core as the “Utah Core.”

2. The Utah State Board of Education adopts the standards but school districts, including schools, teams, and teachers, select the curriculum best suited to meet that standard. We understand the complexity of identifying the most suitable curriculum, resources, and text to meet our Utah State Standards. Teacher time is at a premium. Because of this, a great deal of time and energy is spent at the district level researching, receiving teacher input, and forming focus groups to vet the myriad of available programs and resources in order to identify those that best meet our needs in the Washington County School District.

If a state adopted standards and there are no textbooks available except through a few vendors who just by chance happened to be part of the creation of Common Core’s standards, does that really mean local schools had a choice in curriculum selection? Common Core is a corporate boondoggle. Pearson, McGraw-Hill, and a few others stood to make billions putting smaller companies out of business. They should be prosecuted for insider trading. Now I don’t know what extraordinary measures you went to in Washington County SD to determine the best programs from the myriad of available options, but I can’t imagine the choice was quite as difficult as you make out since I know in other areas of the state the choices were not very plentiful. That’s one of the reasons the state office of education decided to put together their own ad hoc math curriculum written by 5 constructivist math teachers which starts off with an exercise in group think and gets worse from there.

3. The Utah Core Standards do not lower academic expectations. The standards raise the bar in Language Arts and Math, making sure ALL Utah students are prepared to compete in an ever changing global economy. Utah State Senator Howard Stephenson affirmed,  “ I am convinced the Utah Core Standards in math and language arts are right for Utah students. These standards will better prepare our students for college and to be competitive in the global economy. These standards are in harmony with Utah values.” (April 2012).  There is a growing majority of teachers who acknowledge that the increase in rigor, relevancy, application and collaborative problem solving required of students, as a result of the new Utah Core Standards, is helping with critical thinking skills and better preparing them for post-secondary endeavors.

By “do not lower academic expectations” do you mean that Common Core elevates math by pushing completion of algebra 1 into 9th grade under Common Core instead of 8th grade where is used to be? Dr. David Wright, math professor at BYU, has written an enlightening op-ed you may wish to refer to about the horrid implementation of Common Core math in Utah. I think you should ask Senator Stephenson where he stands now on Common Core and not from 2 years ago. Back then, Utah barely knew what had hit her. Now that teachers and legislators and the public have seen more of Common Core, they are growing more horrified at the sheer stupidity of math assignments, the compounding confusion of constructivism, and the abandonment of common sense when educrats were so against No Child Left Behind but have embraced Common Core which is NCLB on steroids.

4. Our commitment to the professional learning community (PLC) process provides us our best chance to meet the varied needs of our students and the standards which are established. This, above all else, is why we are passionately committed to the PLC process. Programs change, curricula changes, even our assessment systems change. These changes have become part of our current educational climate. What has not changed is the need for schools to function as true PLCs and for teachers to work in highly effective teams. Because of this, it becomes more critical than ever that we focus on working in highly effective teams that:

If I didn’t think it was sacrilegious, I would type out a prayer right here to give me strength. Do you not see how Common Core does NOT EVEN BEGIN TO MEET VARIED NEEDS?!?! There is a lawsuit in Alpine school district right now based on this very issue. The whole purpose of Common Core was to STANDARDIZE CHILDREN. Bill Gates came along and saw inefficiencies in the computer world and said, “if we just had a single great platform where everything worked the same, it would introduce super efficiencies to the business world.” Lo and behold, Bill signed an agreement with UNESCO in 2004 to create a global education system and standardize children on a single platform which came to be known as Common Core. Under Common Core we are treating all children like identical factory parts that just need the same nuts and bolts strapped on them in order to turn out perfect little products. Common Core isn’t meant to improve critical thinking, it’s meant to drive differences and diversity right out of the human spirit.

1. identify those things that every student NEEDS to know,

Do you really think Common Core specifies what “every student NEEDS to know?” Does Common Core contain standards on how to open a checking account? How to balance a budget? Common Core is a very small subset of things that a very small group of people deemed students should know by a certain grade level, without doing any research and without pilot testing the standards for appropriateness. Further, the standards were never benchmarked internationally as has been stated.

2.develops and frequently give common formative assessments,

How often do you think children need formative assessments? We are stressing kids out already. Isn’t learning supposed to be joyful to teach children to love learning? Why do we keep having behavioral problems in schools? Why can’t schools interest those students? Hmmm…. Something to ponder.

3. effectively uses data from these assessments to collaboratively identify which students need extra assistance and those who are prepared for extensions, and

4. provide immediate and specific intervention focused on the lacking skill or concept.

This is one of the few things in your letter I agree might be one of the outcomes. By testing and trying to identify the specific areas of weakness, you can tell where a child has problems. Of course if you didn’t do testing and let teachers create a positive environment, students could feel comfortable asking questions and getting answers and I’m guessing teachers could still figure out where a child was weak in a skill.

Please understand that we are learning together. Our school board, district office staff, schools and teacher teams are committed to fully embedding the PLC process. This IS what will drive learning in our schools and provide us with our best chance of ensuring that each and every student in the Washington County School District learn at high levels.

No, this is what will drive SCHOOLING, not learning. Becoming educated and schooled are two different things. Common Core and the compulsory education model are designed to school children. Make them obedient to authority, put them on a schedule, and drive the love of learning from them. You’re not ensuring students learn at high levels. Common Core doesn’t even reach high levels. In high achieving countries they are 2 years ahead of Common Core by 8th grade.

For further information and resources regarding our Utah Core Standards, please visit washk12.org and click on the “Utah State Board of Education Core Standards” icon.

Superintendent Larry Bergeson

To you parents in Washington County School District, please read all the references I’ve linked to. Do your own homework, and watch the new Common Core movie to hear what the content and validation committee experts have to say about Common Core, and why you should oppose Common Core to protect your children and ensure they become educated.

 

2014 Candidate Survey Results

2014 Candidate Survey Results
2014 Candidate Survey Results

Want to see where your candidates for office are? Look here. We don’t have a ton of results yet from around the state, but we do have quite a few.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0An7_5IjcOBbydFYwMDZXcXhyaUljSmxLRllVdUZJZEE&usp=sharing

 

If you don’t see your candidates’ responses, please ask them to immediately take the survey here:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Yr9e4T-E5Z8aDIi67KZRyUHQdeY4m0bq_fwLJIcjHEs/viewform

2014 Candidate Survey

Utah Physics Teacher Stuart Harper Resigns over Common Core

Stuart Harper, physics teacher in St. George, previously wrote an article that was published on this site. Through his own research he had concerns and dared to voice them in a system that doesn’t like unique thought and demands conformity. I can’t tell you how many teachers I’ve received emails from expressing support for our movement and concern that they can’t speak out or risk losing their job. When a teacher tells me their entire department has issues with Common Core, the education system responds calling us liars for saying such a thing. The USOE is heavily and understandably invested in the success of Common Core. They made a major decision to take the entire state of Utah into a path of pilot testing standards that had never been used and had no textbooks written for them. Something so risky based solely on a decision that it COULD POTENTIALLY result in the receipt of federal dollars, should result in the firings of the officers that pushed to adopt the standards before they were written and without any public meetings. These people are still in positions of power at the USOE, and tragically, continue to push for something which is designed to teach our children what to think, not how to think, the same way they demand teachers are treated. Here is Stuart Harpers email and resignation letter. Please pray for Stuart and our teachers who are unable to speak out, being swallowed up in an education beast that consumes 65% of our state budget.

“As rumor of my story has been circulating and has made it back to me in fragmented forms, I want to publicly give my version of the story. My goal is not to paint myself as a victim nor is it to demonize anyone who has been involved in threatening me. Rather, I hope to remind citizens that we have a duty to be informed and involved in the education of the rising generation. I hope to raise awareness of the corruption that is within our school system and how it trickles down to each level through intimidation. I also hope to encourage others to ask questions, fight for local control and stand up for what is truly best for our students and local communities.”

Stuart Harper

Resignation Letter

“January 25, 2014

Be it known that at the conclusion of my contract this year I will resign my post as a public school teacher. I do not do this lightly, but with a heavy heart and with much sorrow. I am leaving an ideal position at a wonderful school, teaching the subject I love. My reasons for leaving and the situation I find myself in are most unfortunate, but I think it beneficial for others to learn of events which have lead to my decision. Understand that I hold no ill will toward any individuals involved. I realize they are merely victims of a corrupt system.

As a citizen I have a responsibility to be involved in civic affairs. As a teacher and father I have an added interest in educational affairs and have a duty to support what I believe is truly best for the parents and students of my community.

After much research I know that the Common Core (CC), the way it has been implemented, and the reforms which have accompanied it are wrong. They are unsound, of poor quality, take power from local government, and further empower federal agencies and policy makers. Most importantly, their enactment was unconstitutional, both in Utah and in the nation. However wrong CC may be, my reasons for resigning are only tangent to this constitutional breech. I was aware of the core before signing on, and though I did not approve of it I gave my word in contract to teach whatever curriculum I was given.

In the summer of 2013 a personal letter I had written stating my concerns with CC was posted on the Utahns Against Common Core website. It was an opinion piece, not a scholarly review. I saw no problem with stating my opinion, it is my right as a citizen, at least so I thought.

A few months later, I was informed that the Utah State Office of Education (USOE) had learned of my published letter and was not happy with my opinions or concerns. Local school authorities were instructed to meet with me and put me back in line. During this meeting with the district representatives I was told that I was shallow, ignorant and emotional in the way I wrote my concerns and that by writing things like this I would create rebellion and insubordination across the district. I was told I can have an opinion with other state’s educational systems but as a teacher in the state of Utah I cannot be concerned with my own state’s educational affairs. I reminded them that my intent was not to promote rebellion, but to simply encourage personal research on the subject and exercise freedom of speech on my off time, as a citizen and father. I was told “Those freedom of speech rights you are probably referring to do not apply.”

I was shocked, but I stood my ground. I made it clear that if I continued to be intimidated into silence that I would resign same day. I told them that I have given my word to teach what they want me to in the classroom and would continue, but I would also continue to use my rights as an American citizen to effect political change. They said I could share my research if I get my facts straight, but even then my job is on the line. When I told them that I would continue to research information from original sources as well as writings from those for and against CC they were confused. They discouraged me from seeking information from anywhere other than the USOE, and accept only their interpretations of the facts. I refused, reminding them that true education comes from educating yourself on all sides.

I was threatened on three separate occasions with professional action all because I stated my opinion. I did not resign at any of the instances where I found myself threatened because I realized that I had given my word that I would teach for the year, and I will not break my word.  However I refuse to remain in an environment that clearly has no respect for the Constitutional right of free speech. I refuse to be a part of the problem.

Over the years the school system has fallen far below what it should be. The public school system is just that – public. It should represent those served by it – We the People. Each level of the system (classroom, school, district and state) fails to remember that its duty is to the people, not to the establishment. We should be representing what is in our students’ and our community’s best interest. Our current system expects acceptance and conformity to its decisions and policies by all of its teachers and administrators. Further, it expects this without questioning or voicing concerns and even goes as far as intimidating and threatening those who have differing opinions. Any society or organization that silences and discourages freedom of speech removes the possibility to express ideas, and without competing ideas we close the door on true education and open the door to tyranny.

The public education system is filled with hundreds upon thousands of good people who want to make a difference, but they are all confined by the way this system has been engineered. There now exists a growing centralized system which extends its control into every classroom and robs each teacher of their freedom. In direct opposition to this centralized overreach, I believe schools should make most decisions on a very local level. Domestic tranquility is ensured by taking care of things in our homes and communities and by having parents, teachers and students work together to create the best situation. We have lost control of the classroom and continue to hand more and more power over to the government. Our current system no longer promotes learning, but rather focuses on training. It teaches what to think, not how to think. It is now a system of hoops for students, teachers, and administrators, and with further national control and regulations of education, these hoops have been set on fire.

I believe that until we can get education to become self-sufficient where it no longer relies on the funding and intimidation from federal and even state levels, until we can bring education back to learning how to think and not being trained for a test, and until we can bring freedom back to the individual teachers, students, and schools, our public system will continue to decay. I hope the system and its people can exercise the self discipline to do this, but where I cannot foresee this happening, my greatest hope for education now resides in home-schools, home-school groups, and in private education.

My hands are tied within this system. But I now know that I can be more productive on the outside. I will continue to promote true and correct educational principles, awareness of civic affairs, and our duty to be involved. I am going to be a part of the solution. Asking questions is the essence of education. All I encourage of others is to ask questions, seek truth and not be afraid to share that truth with other Americans who are willing to listen.

Sincerely,

Mr. Stuart Harper

Teacher, Citizen, and Father”

 

2014 UACC Legislator Scorecard

scorecard

The 2014 legislative session was a mixed bag for us, as was expected. The list of bills below were the most critical items we were following as it pertains to Common Core reforms. Legislators clearly need additional education about the entire Common Core reform agenda. There are key elements that must be understood regarding data tracking, privacy, assessments, parental rights, and curriculum, besides the overall quality of the standards. Follow this link to see how your legislator scored in these key bills we were tracking during the 2014 session.

HB 81Expands the number of parents able to review the SAGE exams
HB 96Sets up state affiliated preschool programs
HB 223Non-partisan elections means the education establishment picks a candidate to support. It’s a 1-party system.
HB 228Partisan school board elections allow for close examination of candidates by representatives of the public. It is electioneering in a republic.
HB 342We initially supported this bill as it would have put Utah on its own high quality standards and removed us from the Common Core reforms. Then it was amended in such a way as to totally neuter it. There was some confusion among legislators whether to support it or not so we are not including it in our analysis.
HB 417Sets up lexile scores for English reading assignments and makes it easier to put informational texts in place instead of literature.
HB 250Instructs school boards that they do not work for the district but represent the public interest.
SB 34Sets up further data tracking of Utah children and aligns education with workforce projections.
SB 39Allows homeschoolers to be free from governmental influence and to chart their own course
SB 42Sets up state affiliated preschool programs
SB 43Sets up state affiliated preschool programs
SB 103Allows school districts control over how they allocate seat time to students
SB 122Establishes a set of rights for parents
SB 209Relaxes the school grading system so if a school has less than 95% of students participate on the SAGE assessments, they are only dropped 1 letter grade instead of an automatic F.

 

Blatant Political Indoctrination in 4th Grade Utah Classroom

politicalpartiesI am protecting the identity of the teacher and school this happened at for the time being in an effort to allow for additional information to hopefully come to light, but I want you to know that this was overheard by an individual who was passing a 4th grade Utah classroom last week. This person is willing to speak with a legislator about this to confirm his/her identity and testify this was very clearly stated. If this is happening in one classroom in this state, you can bet it’s happening in more.

I personally heard a teacher (or most likely, a substitute) saying “The Democratic Party passes laws that are for the common man. The Republican Party passes laws that are for corporations. WE are the common man.” She said this loud and clear, three times in a row, as though she were drilling it into the students’ heads.

I want to ask each of you to immediately consider filing for school board positions in your local races, and run to be a delegate in your caucus meetings. You can file for school board at your county seat AND MUST DO SO BY THIS THURSDAY OR YOU WILL BE TOO LATE. Some seats don’t even have candidates and many candidates are running unopposed at this point (come on Orem…). Please get out and file for office.

In leaving this school unidentified, I also hope that each of you will have a conversation about this with your child and learn what’s happening behind your back in the schools.

Public education has served as a check on the power of parents, and this is another powerful reason for maintaining it.”- John Goodlad, Developing Democratic Character in the Young, pg. 165 (Mr. Goodlad is a nationally prominent educator and has been BYU’s Department of Education consultant since 1983 and is well loved by professors in that department. It’s unknown if they share this view with Mr. Goodlad, but reading what Goodlad write about, and seeing what is going on in schools, should encourage a lot of you to consider homeschooling.)

I also received this email from a reading aide who gave permission to post her name with this. Too many people have fixated on the Common Core standards being indoctrinating in some way. That’s a red herring that we have never espoused. The standards are public, weak, and a convenient strawman for proponents of Common Core to accuse us of having as our focal point. It will always be things that aren’t immediately accessible to the public that push the troubling things, such as this reading aide notes.

“It was part of our SAGE training that our school put on. They were sample questions and I found them to be inappropriate for the grade level they were intended (3rd). Also in my reading endorsement class we were asked to read an article and write a 3-5 paragraph argumentative/persuasive essay for or against the article. We had to include facts out of the article that supported our position. This was a sample of part of the writing test that will be given to 5th grade and up. We asked the teacher how a student was to successfully argue against it without having an article to read showing the opposing side. She said that wasn’t the intent of the test and we had to teach our kids to read informative texts and pull facts from it regardless of how they may feel about what they are reading. I was stunned. The more I look into this the more I am convinced it has nothing to do with critical thinking and all to do with indoctrinating our children.” – Michelle Klaas Boulter, (Reading Aide at George Washington Academy in Saint George)

Last, here’s an email I received last night. This is pure behavioral testing of children. It has nothing to do with getting an education and everything to do with creating a profile of children. In fact, some of the questions could violate Utah law but most parents would never know this. If you didn’t watch the video on this page (https://www.utahnsagainstcommoncore.com/why-you-must-opt-your-child-out-of-all-computer-adaptive-tests/), please do so and you’ll understand why this is so critical.

“I’m wondering what you know about a certain test that my kids who are in a virtual charter school (Mountain Heights Academy) were required to take at the beginning of this year. It’s called the Engage Test.  I don’t think there could be a more ABSURD assignment, ever….. I sat with my son, 8th grade, as he began the test and had to witness till the end.  The questions were like, “True or False– I feel anger when others say rude things about me.”  Followed by “When people put me down in front of others I feel: (multiple choice)”.  “True or False– I try my best when I feel support from my parents.” “My teachers are able to help me when I have a question:  All the time, most of the time, sometimes, once in a while, never (choose).”  THIS WENT ON FOR 120 QUESTIONS. Insane.  My son and I were aghast as page after page kept coming and we couldn’t skip to the end, nor could we skip any questions or it would say “enter field”.

At the time, I didn’t know better than to just do the assignment, but now I would just simply ignore it and let the lesson go undone.  Before he did it, we kept getting automated phone called saying it wasn’t done, so I guess it was a big deal to them. If I hadn’t sat down with him, I wouldn’t have known about it.  I wonder how many other parents just don’t know what’s being assigned?

All that being said, let me share with you a letter from former State Superintendent Patti Harrington which she sent to all House members when HB 223 and 228 were up for votes. Bolding below is Ms. Harrington’s. Red text is mine.

Good morning House Representatives –

Thank you for passing HB223 School Board Elections (J. Nielson) last night!  Utahns deserve to vote directly on the candidates for the State Board – those who set policy for the schools that serve their most precious possessions – their children.  We appreciate legislators who have brought this issue to light during the 2014 Session.

The House may hear today HB228 Utah State Board of Education Elections and Reporting Amendments (B. Greene).  Respecting (as we do) both sponsors, may we offer some reasons from discussions with your local school board members on why State Board elections should remain non-partisan and open?

  • The State Board of Education is a independent board, independent from both the legislative and executive branch, although vitally involved in both.  The State Board is Constitutionally protected in its independence.  Partisan races for seats on the Board may easily erode some of the Board’s independence.
  • Today’s use of internet and social media allows state board candidates to reach nearly all voters in all areas of the state and at reasonable cost; a political party doesn’t have to do that for them or fund their campaigns. 
  • Politics may create instability in schools in terms of changing policies, altered resources, shifting regulations, etc.  Schools operate best when children feel stability and are provided with excellent resources and quality teachers, none of whom have to worry about certain political candidates in the next election who may alter programs or shift resources.
  • Teachers try hard to keep politics out of the classroom, (except as it relates to approved Social Studies core standards).  If the State Board becomes partisan and members take political positions affecting schools, the likelihood of politics being discussed in schools, unfortunately, increases. Let’s leave discussions of political persuasion to parents/guardians in the home, and, for the older student, let’s leave it on the public square, not in the setting of public education.   Students grow to trust and often love their school teachers; let’s not put them at odds with the politics of their homes from increased political influence on schools.
  • Children do not come to school as Republicans or Democrats; neither should their policy leaders.

Thank you for considering this in your work today!  And thank you for all you do to support public education!

Dr. Patti Harrington

Executive Director

Utah School Superintendents Association

Dear Ms. Harrington, you may want to re-evaluate your statements based on what’s really happening in Utah classrooms.

Your five points have issues as well.

1) The state board doesn’t have constitutionally protected independence. By saying such you are demonstrating you don’t understand what “general control and supervision” means in the Utah constitution. It doesn’t create a 4th branch of government which the other 3 can’t touch.

2) Really? You think the internet provides clear and accurate information to voters? Who among the public takes the time to look up who is running for state school board? School board races are the least watched and most critical races in the state. School boards affect the rising generation and the public is totally in the dark about who is running. Not 1 in 100 voters looks up their state school board candidate’s website, and none of those websites indicate the depth of information that should be known about a candidate. They’re full of safe, politically correct statements. The only way to understand a candidate is to grill that person. The public is completely underserved by not having partisan elections where the political philosophy of a candidate is known so that people know how that person will act. Political parties don’t have to fund people’s campaigns and that’s not what partisan elections are about. You should run to become a delegate and see the amount of work that goes into vetting candidates for office. That’s what it’s about. It isn’t just “how Republican” or “Democrat” you are. People ask about qualifications for positions such as involvement in education, understanding their background, what motivated them to run, and many other things that will never be stated on a billboard or yard sign.

3) Prove this. Where have partisan elections created instability in school district boards? If you elected 7 Democrats to a school district, or 7 Republicans, which set is going to shut down the schools? To infer they will is fearmongering. Texas moved to partisan elections a while back and their children aren’t dealing with massive instability in schools. What happened in Texas was conservatives on the state board brought balance to what was being taught in schools. They didn’t gut liberals out of schools. They just made sure BOTH SIDES OF AN ISSUE WERE PRESENTED. (see Michelle’s story above for why this is important)

4) Please refer to the first story at the top of this page. Here’s another story about youth being indoctrinated that communism isn’t that bad. I’ve had plenty more like it over the years. It’s taking place precisely because teachers are of all political persuasions and if they sense they can shape their students, it’s pretty natural to make them question… Then prove the rest of your assertion. Texas has had partisan elections since the 90’s. They aren’t sending political party recruiters into schools to change students beliefs. Not like what just got exposed in Utah above… How many more classrooms is this happening in without the knowledge of parents?

5) You cannot separate personal politics from public action. Partisan elections aren’t to polarize the board by identifying who belongs to what party, but by letting hundreds or thousands of delegates make the best decision they can for the public at large, and then letting the public choose between more clearly defined alternatives who have all been vetted by a smaller number of locally elected representatives, we get the best possible candidates. There is no better system than informed people making a decision for the public at large. That’s a political form called a Republic which we pledge allegiance to and you swore an oath to the Constitution to defend and uphold. Non-partisan elections do not fit that form of government so well. They are more akin to Democracy where people are more easily swayed by big money campaigns.

It’s clearly time for partisan elections in Utah. We need to let the cream rise to the top, and not have a committee of the governor’s appointees filter out candidates based on their views such as asking people, “what do you think of Common Core” and then eliminating them from consideration if they say anything less than how wonderful it is.

Please help bring back HB 228 – Partisan School Board Elections

Alisa Ellis sent this great letter to her House Representative and gave permission to post it here.

*******************

My state school board rep is a really nice lady but she doesn’t feel accountable to the people.  I’ve been working on these education issues for 3 years and in that time she’s emailed me back a handful of times but has NEVER met with me.  I’ve asked her to lunch.  We’ve invited her to come to meetings in Heber but she’s declined all invitations or else something has come up. This is in large part because of the way the state board is elected.  THEY DO NOT FEEL ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE.

This is exhausting.  When I first started pushing back against the centralization of powers over education, I tried going to my local board and superintendent.  They told me this was out of their hands and they had to do what the state told them.

Next I tried the state board.  I went up to give a two minute speech and was quickly pulled into a little room where staff members tried to “teach me” about how wrong I was in my analysis. They told me my local school board was implementing this wrong and that I needed to go back to the local board and let them know.

Well, I’d been there and done that so I met the Governor at a candidate night and he agreed to sit down and discuss my concerns.  He told me that his office has nothing to do with this and that I needed to go talk to someone else.

I only had one option left — the legislature.  The legislature has been the most responsive by far of any other government body but they too throw up their hands and tell me there is nothing they can do and send me on my way.  They send me back to the school board.  When I go back to the school board…… THEY BLAME THE LEGISLATORS!!

While each branch of government fights about who is in charge it is us, the people, that are left without a voice.  This bill isn’t about putting politics in education.  It’s about giving the people back their voice and making the state board feel accountable to the people not to the “educrats”.  Please help – Say yes to HB228

Thank you,

Alisa Ellis

 

Granite School District teacher on Common Core Assessments

Saturday, March 1st, Autumn Cook from the Left/Right Alliance was a guest on Weston Clark’s radio show, The Progress Report, which airs on K-Talk 630 am. Immediately after her interview, a teacher from Granite school district who “supports the idea of a common core” shared these interesting thoughts on the amount of testing students are getting now. In fact, he mentioned that it’s so much, teachers no longer have time to do their own tests because there is so much test prep for the Common Core assessments.

http://youtu.be/maQm0FNqkpY

Teacher Mercedes Schneider Shreds Common Core

Teacher Mercedes Schneider spoke on a panel last week at the Network for Public Education Conference. She is from Louisiana and holds a PhD in applied statistics and research methods. Listen to her brief speech as she shreds Common Core. Then read her excellent article on how Gates is funding the Department of Education to hold labor-management conferences to help with implementation of Common Core.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mercedes-schneider/gates-is-funding-usdoe-co_b_4714103.html