The fantasy land of DEI indoctrination in our schools is coming to a close. President Trump has ordered the removal of DEI nonsense from schools and the feds have set up a reporting hotline to enforce it. Schools violating the requirement risk losing federal funds, though I don’t know the full extent of all the paths it currently gets to them. Regardless, it’s a relief to see action finally be taken by responsible leadership to eradicate this vile indoctrination.
Report infractions at your schools to the feds here:
UPDATED 2/24/2024 to put this list of top candidates at the top of this post.
District 3 Rod Hall (Brent’s seat)
District 7 Kris Kimball (Molly’s seat)
District 9 Natalie Cline
District 10 Monica Wilbur (Matt’s seat)
District 12 Cole Kelley (Jim’s seat)
District 13 Alyson Robertson or Cari Bartholomew (Randy’s seat)
District 15 Joann Brinton (Kristin’s seat)
***********
ORIGINAL POST:
This week at the state board meeting, 8 of 15 members voted to not overturn a rule (R277-328) the board previously adopted which is now in violation of state law (https://le.utah.gov/~2023/bills/static/HB0427.html).
“DEI” for diversity, equity, and inclusion, is a push for CRT.
In reality, diversity means homogeneity, equity means inequity, and inclusion means exclusion. Everything is determined by the ones writing the rules and that means those looking for something other than academic achievement and common sense.
The 8 members who voted to maintain the indoctrination rule are:
Brent, Molly, Randy, and Kristan, all face challenges from candidates I believe will do a much better job. I recognize several of the challengers names and I am so grateful they are running.
The caucus system will reject these 4, but unfortunately, they have indicated they will do signature gathering and try to dupe conservative voters into absentmindedly signing petitions under the guise of “don’t you want a chance to vote for all the qualified candidates on the ballot? This candidate might not be able to have their voice heard without your help…” And other such nonsense.
If they had a message that resonated with their political party base, take it to them and let the elected representatives of their neighborhoods vote for the candidate that best represents their area. Utah is one of the best managed states under this system and it’s time we brought management of our schools fully under the caucus system instead of special interest groups.
Among the other 7 who thankfully voted to repeal the rule, these 3 are also up for re-election: Matt Hymas (seat 10), James Moss (seat 12), and Natalie Cline (seat 9).
Natalie needs no introduction here as she has been a strong voice for parental rights and is clearly the one to vote for in her race.
Utah’s school children wither under the influence of toxic DEI/CRT nonsense. Parental rights are being stripped away. Get informed on the races in your area and get involved so you can help effect positive change at the state school board (and watch your local races too.)
When the county and state conventions convene to determine the candidates that will be on the ballot, I will update this post to share the candidates to vote for.
This is the year to run as a delegate and help make a difference in our state school board and other offices.
Parents, this is critical information you must understand to protect your family.
You and your children have a right to conscience that has not always been respected in our public education system.
This past legislative session, HB 348, Participation Waiver Amendments, was sponsored by Representative Cheryl Acton and Senator Mike Kennedy. It does something amazing in protecting families from those times when a student in class feels something is violating their belief system. They now have an out.
However, the key to this bill is GETTING EDUCATED ON HOW IT WORKS.
It’s really simple, but if you don’t know it exists, you can’t use it.
Know your rights and protect your family.
Violations
If you are faced with an issue where the school violates your or your child’s rights, send an email to board@schools.utah.gov AND audit@schools.utah.gov. The audit address is for the state office to investigate, and the board address is to make sure the state board knows an infraction has occurred.
3 things to get educated:
Video
1) I have made a video with State board member Natalie Cline, Monica Wilbur from HigherGround.work, and myself discussing this bill and how it works. Please watch it here:
Handouts
2) Here are handouts Representative Acton passed out for Q&A to help everyone understand the bill and alleviate concerns.
The bill passed in the Senate on a unanimous vote 27-0-2. In the House it was 51-17-7. Governor Cox signed the bill. It’s law.
3) Here is a link to the bill but I’m also including the text so you can read it here. The protections I have colored red. Use this code language and reference any time a school issue arises to show officials that you understand your rights and they must back down.
If you’re unfamiliar with reading a bill, strikeout text is being removed from code and underlined text is added by the bill.
House Bill 348
1
PARTICIPATION WAIVER AMENDMENTS
2
2023 GENERAL SESSION
3
STATE OF UTAH
4
Chief Sponsor: Cheryl K. Acton
5
Senate Sponsor: Michael S. Kennedy
6
7 LONG TITLE
8 General Description:
9 This bill clarifies how a school responds when a student refrains from participation in
10 school due to a student’s or a student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience.
11 Highlighted Provisions:
12 This bill:
13 ▸ defines terms;
14 ▸ clarifies how a school responds when a student refrains from participation in school
15 due to a student’s or a student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience,
16 consistent with Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 4;
17 ▸ grants the State Board of Education rulemaking authority; and
18 ▸ makes technical and conforming changes.
19 Money Appropriated in this Bill:
20 None
21 Other Special Clauses:
22 None
23 Utah Code Sections Affected:
24 AMENDS:
25 53G-10-203, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2018, Chapter 3
26 53G-10-205, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2019, Chapter 293
27
28 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
29 Section 1. Section 53G-10-203 is amended to read:
30 53G-10-203.Expressions of belief — Discretionary time.
31 (1) Expression of personal beliefs by a student participating in school-directed
32 curricula or activities may not be prohibited or penalized unless the expression unreasonably
33 interferes with order or discipline, threatens the well-being of persons or property, or violates
34 concepts of civility or propriety appropriate to a school setting.
35 (2) (a) As used in this section, “discretionary time” means noninstructional time during
36 which a student is free to pursue personal interests.
37 (b) Free exercise of voluntary religious practice or freedom of speech by students
38 during discretionary time shall not be denied unless the conduct unreasonably interferes with
39 the ability of school officials to maintain order and discipline, unreasonably endangers persons
40 or property, or violates concepts of civility or propriety appropriate to a school setting.
41 (3) Any limitation under [Sections 53G-10-203 and 53G-10-205] this section on
42 student expression, practice, or conduct shall be by the least restrictive means necessary to
43 satisfy the school’s interests [as stated in those sections], or to satisfy another specifically
44 identified compelling governmental interest.
45 Section 2. Section 53G-10-205 is amended to read:
46 53G-10-205.Waivers of participation.
47 (1) As used in this section[, “school”]:
48 (a) “School” means a public school.
49 (b) “Student” means a public school student in kindergarten through grade 12.
50 [(2) If a parent of a student, or a secondary student, determines that the student’s
51 participation in a portion of the curriculum or in an activity would require the student to affirm
52 or deny a religious belief or right of conscience, or engage or refrain from engaging in a
53 practice forbidden or required in the exercise of a religious right or right of conscience, the
54 parent or the secondary student may request:]
55 [(a) a waiver of the requirement to participate; or]
56 [(b) a reasonable alternative that requires reasonably equivalent performance by the
57 student of the secular objectives of the curriculum or activity in question.]
58 [(3)] (2) (a) In accordance with Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 4, a student may 59 refrain from participation in any aspect of school that violates a religious belief or right of 60 conscience of the student. 61 (b) A school may not, in any aspect of school: 62 (i) require or incentivize a student to affirm or deny the student’s or the student’s 63 parent’s religious belief or right of conscience; 64 (ii) engage a student in a practice that violates or is contrary to the student’s or the 65 student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience; or 66 (iii) penalize or discriminate against a student for refraining from participation due to 67 the student’s or the student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience. 68 (3) [The school shall] When a student refrains from participating in any aspect of 69 school that violates the student’s or the student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience, 70 the school: 71 (a) shall promptly notify [a] the student’s parent [if the secondary student makes a 72 request under Subsection (2).]; 73 (b) may offer an alternative that does not violate the student’s or the student’s parent’s 74 religious belief or right of conscience; and 75 (c) may not require the student or the student’s parent to explain, defend, or justify the 76 student’s or the student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience. 77 (4) A student’s parent may waive the student’s participation in any aspect of school that 78 violates the student’s or the student’s parent’s religious belief or right of conscience.
79 (5) In accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, the
80 state board shall make rules consistent with this section.
81 [(4) If a request is made under Subsection (2), the school shall:]
82 [(a) waive the participation requirement;]
83 [(b) provide a reasonable alternative to the requirement; or]
84 [(c) notify the requesting party that participation is required.]
85 [(5) The school shall ensure that the provisions of Subsection 53G-10-203(3) are met
86 in connection with any required participation under Subsection (4)(c).]
87 [(6) A student’s academic or citizenship performance may not be penalized if the
88 secondary student or the student’s parent chooses to exercise a religious right or right of
89 conscience in accordance with the provisions of this section.]
Many people ask what to do when your child is subjected to subversive or inappropriate content at school. It can happen from exposure to inappropriate media, curriculum, teacher’s comments, and even state assessments or surveys.
When it happens (not if) here are the steps to take. If it happened in the past, still try to do this process.
(If you are a teacher forced to teach this content, see step 4b)
0) Prevention (pre-vent before you “vent”)
You should do your best to prevent indoctrination in the first place. Turn in the opt out forms for subversive content, gender ideology, state assessments, and where applicable, digital surveillance of your home. These forms put educators on notice by reminding them of state laws to not touch certain subjects or administer surveys that contain such content.
(https://www.utahnsagainstcommoncore.com/action-list/opt-out-forms/)
Then talk with your child about these forms and let them know their teachers are being informed and reminded of certain things that are not to be taught. Teach your children